Virtual reality and virtual worlds: a favorable setting for the preservation of cultural heritage

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/mr2024.110

Keywords:

Virtual reality, cultural heritage, digital preservation, community engagement, technology ethics

Abstract

This article analyzes the literature regarding virtual reality (VR) and virtual worlds in cultural heritage preservation during the period 2018–2022. Through a hermeneutic review of specialized literature, key trends were identified that reveal how these technologies have evolved from visualization tools to active participation platforms. The findings reveal significant advances in the reconstruction of at-risk heritage, the documentation of intangible cultural expressions, and the creation of immersive educational experiences. However, tensions persist between technological innovation and accessibility, as well as ethical challenges surrounding the authentic representation of cultural contexts. The study highlights the need for collaborative frameworks that involve local communities in virtualization processes, ensuring that these initiatives not only preserve but also strengthen the emotional and identity-based connection with heritage. It concludes that while VR offers promising solutions, its implementation requires rigorous protocols that balance technical accuracy, social inclusion, and long-term sustainability.

References

1. ASSMANN A. The future of cultural heritage and its challenges. En: Cultural Sustainability: Perspectives from the Humanities and Social Sciences. 1a ed. Routledge; 2018. p. 25–35. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351124300-3

2. Khalaf RW. Cultural Heritage Reconstruction after Armed Conflict: Continuity, Change, and Sustainability. The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice. 2020;11(1):4–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/17567505.2019.1605709

3. Higuera Carrillo EL. Aspectos clave en agroproyectos con enfoque comercial: Una aproximación desde las concepciones epistemológicas sobre el problema rural agrario en Colombia. Región Científica. 2022;1(1):20224. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc20224

4. Otero J. Heritage Conservation Future: Where We Stand, Challenges Ahead, and a Paradigm Shift. Global Challenges. 2022;6(1):2100084. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gch2.202100084

5. Parrinello S, Dell’Amico A. Experience of Documentation for the Accessibility of Widespread Cultural Heritage. Heritage. 2019;2(1):1032–44. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage2010067

6. Trillo C, Aburamadan R, Mubaideen S, Salameen D, Makore BCN. Towards a Systematic Approach to Digital Technologies for Heritage Conservation. Insights from Jordan. Preservation, Digital Technology & Culture. 2020;49(4):121–38. https://doi.org/10.1515/pdtc-2020-0023

7. Selmanović E, Rizvic S, Harvey C, Boskovic D, Hulusic V, Chahin M, et al. Improving Accessibility to Intangible Cultural Heritage Preservation Using Virtual Reality. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage. 2020;13(2):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3377143

8. Theodoropoulos A, Antoniou A. VR Games in Cultural Heritage: A Systematic Review of the Emerging Fields of Virtual Reality and Culture Games. Applied Sciences. 2022;12(17):8476. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178476

9. Shiri A, Howard D, Farnel S. Indigenous Digital Storytelling: Digital Interfaces Supporting Cultural Heritage Preservation and Access. International Information & Library Review. 2022;54(2):93–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2021.1946748

10. Poulopoulos V, Wallace M. Digital Technologies and the Role of Data in Cultural Heritage: The Past, the Present, and the Future. Big Data and Cognitive Computing. 2022;6(3):73. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc6030073

11. Sanabria Martínez MJ. Construir nuevos espacios sostenibles respetando la diversidad cultural desde el nivel local. Región Científica. 2022;1(1):20222. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc20222

12. Banfi F, Bolognesi CM. Virtual Reality for Cultural Heritage: New Levels of Computer-Generated Simulation of a Unesco World Heritage Site. En: From Building Information Modelling to Mixed Reality. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021. p. 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49278-6_4

13. Barrado-Timón DA, Hidalgo-Giralt C. The Historic City, Its Transmission and Perception via Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality and the Use of the Past as a Resource for the Present: A New Era for Urban Cultural Heritage and Tourism? Sustainability. 2019;11(10):2835. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102835

14. Luyt B. A new kind of travel guide or more of the same? Wikivoyage and Cambodia. Online Information Review. 2021;45(2):356–71. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-03-2020-0104

15. Hajirasouli A, Banihashemi S, Kumarasuriyar A, Talebi S, Tabadkani A. Virtual reality-based digitisation for endangered heritage sites: Theoretical framework and application. Journal of Cultural Heritage. 2021;49:140–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2021.02.005

16. Ocón D. Digitalisation and Cultural Heritage Tourism in Asia: Stepping in Without Stepping Out. En: Cultural Leadership in Transition Tourism. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022. p. 157–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14121-8_9

17. Wilson AS, Gaffney V, Gaffney C, Ch’ng E, Bates R, Ichumbaki EB, et al. Curious Travellers: Using Web-Scraped and Crowd-Sourced Imagery in Support of Heritage Under Threat. En: Visual Heritage: Digital Approaches in Heritage Science. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022. p. 51–65. (Springer Series on Cultural Computing). https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-77028-0_4

18. Pokorný P, Falešník D. Historical 3D Visualisations of Starý Světlov Castle Using Blender and Unreal Engine. En: Software Engineering and Algorithms. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021. p. 351–62. (Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems; vol. 230). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77442-4_30

19. Winiarczyk-Raźniak A, Raźniak P. Are Pueblos Mágicos Really Magic? Tourism Development Program in the Context of the Quality of Life of Town Residents. Land. 2021;10(12):1342. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10121342

20. Suanpang P, Niamsorn C, Pothipassa P, Chunhapataragul T, Netwong T, Jermsittiparsert K. Extensible Metaverse Implication for a Smart Tourism City. Sustainability. 2022;14(21):14027. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114027

21. Mogrovejo Andrade JM. Estrategias resilientes y mecanismos de las organizaciones para mitigar los efectos ocasionados por la pandemia a nivel internacional. Región Científica. 2022;1(1):202211. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc202211

22. Verma S, Warrier L, Bolia B, Mehta S. Past, present, and future of virtual tourism-a literature review. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights. 2022;2(2):100085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2022.100085

23. Giannini T, Bowen JP. Museums and Digital Culture: From Reality to Digitality in the Age of COVID-19. Heritage. 2022;5(1):192–214. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage5010011

24. Bekele MK, Pierdicca R, Frontoni E, Malinverni ES, Gain J. A Survey of Augmented, Virtual, and Mixed Reality for Cultural Heritage. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage. 2018;11(2):1–36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3145534

25. Barrile V, Bernardo E, Fotia A, Bilotta G. A Combined Study of Cultural Heritage in Archaeological Museums: 3D Survey and Mixed Reality. Heritage. 2022;5(3):1330–49. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage5030069

26. Orozco Castillo EA. Experiencias en torno al emprendimiento femenino. Región Científica. 2022;1(1):20225. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc20225

27. Jadresin Milic R, McPherson P, McConchie G, Reutlinger T, Singh S. Architectural History and Sustainable Architectural Heritage Education: Digitalisation of Heritage in New Zealand. Sustainability. 2022;14(24):16432. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416432

28. Kosmas P, Galanakis G, Constantinou V, Drossis G, Christofi M, Klironomos I, et al. Enhancing accessibility in cultural heritage environments: considerations for social computing. Universal Access in the Information Society. 2020;19(2):471–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-019-00651-4

29. Bruno F, Ricca M, Lagudi A, Kalamara P, Manglis A, Fourkiotou A, et al. Digital Technologies for the Sustainable Development of the Accessible Underwater Cultural Heritage Sites. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2020;8(11):955. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8110955

30. Echavarria KR, Samaroudi M, Dibble L, Silverton E, Dixon S. Creative experiences for engaging communities with cultural heritage through place-based narratives. ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage (JOCCH). 2022;15(2):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479007

31. Dutta U. Digital Preservation of Indigenous Culture and Narratives from the Global South: In Search of an Approach. Humanities. 2019;8(2):68. https://doi.org/10.3390/h8020068

32. Zhong H, Wang L, Zhang H. The application of virtual reality technology in the digital preservation of cultural heritage. Computer Science and Information Systems. 2021;18(2):535–51. https://doi.org/10.2298/CSIS200208009Z

33. Bekele MK, Champion E. A Comparison of Immersive Realities and Interaction Methods: Cultural Learning in Virtual Heritage. Frontiers in Robotics and AI. 2019;6:91. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2019.00091

34. Pietroni E, Ferdani D. Virtual Restoration and Virtual Reconstruction in Cultural Heritage: Terminology, Methodologies, Visual Representation Techniques and Cognitive Models. Information. 2021;12(4):167. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12040167

35. Comes R, Neamțu CGD, Grec C, Buna ZL, Găzdac C, Mateescu-Suciu L. Digital Reconstruction of Fragmented Cultural Heritage Assets: The Case Study of the Dacian Embossed Disk from Piatra Roșie. Applied Sciences. 2022;12(16):8131. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12168131

36. Ocón D. Digitalising endangered cultural heritage in Southeast Asian cities: preserving or replacing? International Journal of Heritage Studies. 2021;27(10):975–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2021.1883711

37. Swords J, Nally C, Rogage K, Watson R, Charlton J, Kirk D. Colliding epistemologies, productive tensions and usable pasts in the generation of heritage-led immersive experiences. International Journal of Heritage Studies. 2021;27(2):186–99.

38. Banfi F. The Evolution of Interactivity, Immersion and Interoperability in HBIM: Digital Model Uses, VR and AR for Built Cultural Heritage. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 2021;10(10):685. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10100685

39. Angélica GMM, Cristina LCC, De Jesús AMD. Museum, School and Augmented Reality, a Way to Preserve the Ethnic Identity of an Ancestral Culture. En: Perspectives and Trends in Education and Technology. Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2022. p. 93–108. (Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies; vol. 256). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5063-5_8

40. Barbara J. Re-Live History: An immersive virtual reality learning experience of prehistoric intangible cultural heritage. Frontiers in Education. 2022;7:1032108. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1032108

41. Kenderdine S, Yip A. The proliferation of aura. En: The Routledge Handbook of Museums, Media and Communication. 1a ed. London: Routledge; 2018. p. 274–89. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315560168-23

42. Hutson J, Olsen T. Virtual Reality and Art History: A Case Study of Digital Humanities and Immersive Learning Environments. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice. 2022;22(2). https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v22i2.5036

43. Soto-Martin O, Fuentes-Porto A, Martin-Gutierrez J. A Digital Reconstruction of a Historical Building and Virtual Reintegration of Mural Paintings to Create an Interactive and Immersive Experience in Virtual Reality. Applied Sciences. 2020;10(2):597. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10020597

44. Boboc RG, Băutu E, Gîrbacia F, Popovici N, Popovici DM. Augmented Reality in Cultural Heritage: An Overview of the Last Decade of Applications. Applied Sciences. 2022;12(19):9859. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12199859

45. Borges Machín AY, González Bravo YL. Educación comunitaria para un envejecimiento activo: experiencia en construcción desde el autodesarrollo. Región Científica. 2022;1(1):202213. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc202213

46. Daldanise G. From Place-Branding to Community-Branding: A Collaborative Decision-Making Process for Cultural Heritage Enhancement. Sustainability. 2020;12(24):10399. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410399

47. Zhang X, Yang D, Yow CH, Huang L, Wu X, Huang X, et al. Metaverse for Cultural Heritages. Electronics. 2022;11(22):3730. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11223730

48. Allam Z, Sharifi A, Bibri SE, Jones DS, Krogstie J. The Metaverse as a Virtual Form of Smart Cities: Opportunities and Challenges for Environmental, Economic, and Social Sustainability in Urban Futures. Smart Cities. 2022;5(3):771–801. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities5030040

49. Sparkes M. What is a metaverse. New Scientist. 2021;251(3348):18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0262-4079(21)01450-0

50. Li K, Cui Y, Li W, Lv T, Yuan X, Li S, et al. When Internet of Things Meets Metaverse: Convergence of Physical and Cyber Worlds. IEEE Internet of Things Journal. 2022;10(5):4148–73. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2022.3232845

51. Bibri SE, Allam Z, Krogstie J. The Metaverse as a virtual form of data-driven smart urbanism: platformization and its underlying processes, institutional dimensions, and disruptive impacts. Computational Urban Science. 2022;2(1):24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43762-022-00051-0

52. Fu Y, Li C, Yu FR, Luan TH, Zhao P, Liu S. A Survey of Blockchain and Intelligent Networking for the Metaverse. IEEE Internet of Things Journal. 2022;10(4):3587–610. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2022.3222521

53. Yilmaz M, Hacaloğlu T, Clarke P. Examining the Use of Non-fungible Tokens (NFTs) as a Trading Mechanism for the Metaverse. En: Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022. p. 18–28. (Communications in Computer and Information Science; vol. 1646). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15559-8_2

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

1.
Jiménez Pérez GA, Pérez Gamboa AJ, Gómez Cano CA. Virtual reality and virtual worlds: a favorable setting for the preservation of cultural heritage. Metaverse Basic and Applied Research [Internet]. 2024 Dec. 31 [cited 2025 May 23];3:.110. Available from: https://mr.ageditor.ar/index.php/mr/article/view/110