Virtual Reality as a Tool for Developing Intercultural Competence in the Global Educational Space
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/mr2025126Keywords:
Global education, Intercultural consciousness, Interactive learning, Modern technologies, Virtual realityAbstract
Introduction: The study investigated the effectiveness of virtual reality (VR) technology in developing intercultural competencies among university students within the context of global education.
Objective: To evaluate the impact of virtual reality-based educational interventions on the development of intercultural competence, empathy, and intercultural communication skills among university students compared to traditional learning methods.
Methods: A quasi-experimental design was employed with 120 participants aged 18–24 years from four universities in Ukraine, Spain, Poland, and Colombia. Stratified random sampling was used to ensure cultural diversity. The experimental group (n = 60) received VR-based intercultural communication training, while the control group (n = 60) followed traditional learning methods during a 14-day intervention. Data were collected using the Intercultural Competence Index (ICI) and the Intercultural Perspective Questionnaire (IPAQ) in pre- and post-intervention assessments. Statistical analysis included independent samples t-tests and descriptive statistics at a significance level of p < 0.05, with Cronbach’s alpha coefficients above 0.8 confirming instrument reliability.
Results: The VR group demonstrated a significant improvement in overall intercultural competence (M = 78.9 vs M = 64.1, t = 6.42, p < 0.001) compared to the control group. Notable gains were also observed in empathy (t = 5.21, p < 0.001), communication flexibility (t = 4.83, p < 0.001), and tolerance (t = 3.12, p = 0.003).
Conclusions: VR-based training proved effective in enhancing intercultural awareness, empathy, and adaptive communication skills. These competencies are crucial for fostering global citizenship and preparing students for participation in a culturally diverse educational environment.
References
1. Alpala LO, Quiroga-Parra DJ, Torres JC, Peluffo-Ordóñez DH. Smart Factory Using Virtual Reality and Online Multi-User: Towards a Metaverse for Experimental Frameworks. Appl Sci. 2022;12(12):6258. doi:10.3390/app12126258
2. Babych V, Dubovoi O, Zaitsev V, Rydzel Y, Saienko V, Dubovoi V, et al. Improvement of teaching methods of the theoretical component of physical education (with the application of author teaching techniques) in the context of improving the level of social health of students of the special medical group. J Educ Technol Theory. 2022;13(5):1-15.
3. Bashkіrova L, Hruzhevskyi O, Tyravska Yu. The first experience of teaching the elective course "instrumental methods of functional diagnostics". Prospects and Innovations in Science. Series Pedagogy, Series Psychology, Series Medicine. 2024;(6(40)):1023-1035. doi:10.52058/2786-4952-2024-6(40)
4. Baker W. From intercultural to transcultural communication. Lang Intercult Commun. 2021:1-14. doi:10.1080/14708477.2021.2001477
5. Bosa V, Marieiev D, Balalaieva O, Krokhmal A, Solovei A. Implementation of virtual reality in foreign language teaching. Rev Amazon Investig. 2024;13(73):187-99. doi:10.34069/ai/2024.73.01.15
6. Braslauskas J. Developing intercultural competences and creativity: The foundation for successful intercultural communication. Creat Stud. 2021;14(1):197-217. doi:10.3846/cs.2021.14583
7. Chen C, Hung H, Yeh H. Virtual reality in problem‐based learning contexts: Effects on the problem‐solving performance, vocabulary acquisition and motivation of English language learners. J Comput Assist Learn. 2021. doi:10.1111/jcal.12528
8. Chen X, Zou D, Xie H, Wang FL. Metaverse in Education: Contributors, Cooperations, and Research Themes. IEEE Trans Learn Technol. 2023:1-18. doi:10.1109/tlt.2023.3277952
9. Demchenko I, Zahariichuk O, Dergach M, Porodko M, Pryzvanska R. The psychological and pedagogical aspect of the life quality of citizens with disabilities. Rev Amazon Investig. 2022;11(54):339-48. doi:10.34069/ai/2022.54.06.32
10. DeWitt D, Chan SF, Loban R. Virtual reality for developing intercultural communication competence in Mandarin as a Foreign language. Educ Technol Res Dev. 2022. doi:10.1007/s11423-021-10074-9
11. Gong Y. Application of virtual reality teaching method and artificial intelligence technology in digital media art creation. Ecol Inform. 2021;63:101304. doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101304
12. González-Pérez LI, Ramírez-Montoya MS. Components of Education 4.0 in 21st Century Skills Frameworks: Systematic Review. Sustainability. 2022;14(3):1493. doi:10.3390/su14031493
13. Guan JQ, Wang LH, Chen Q, Jin K, Hwang GJ. Effects of a virtual reality-based pottery making approach on junior high school students' creativity and learning engagement. Interact Learn Environ. 2021:1-17. doi:10.1080/10494820.2021.1871631
14. Hackett S, Janssen J, Beach P, Perreault M, Beelen J, van Tartwijk J. The effectiveness of Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL) on intercultural competence development in higher education. Int J Educ Technol High Educ. 2023;20(1). doi:10.1186/s41239-022-00373-3
15. Huang X, Zou D, Cheng G, Xie H. A Systematic Review of AR and VR Enhanced Language Learning. Sustainability. 2021;13(9):4639. doi:10.3390/su13094639
16. Iqbal M, Mangina E, Campbell A. Current Challenges and Future Research Directions in Augmented Reality for Education. Technol Interact. 2022;6(9):75. doi:10.3390/mti6090075
17. Katsouda A, Sakkoula N, Manousou E, Lionarakis A. The philosophy of openness in terms of accessibility through virtual worlds: the case of distance education. Futurity Philosophy. 2024;3(4):47-60. doi:10.57125/FP.2024.12.30.04
18. Krasnozhon N, Lytvynska S, Senchylo-Tatlilioglu N, Revenko V, Salata H. Development of education and science in the historical industry in the conditions of transformations. Rev Line Politica Gestao Educ. 2022:e022007. doi:10.22633/rpge.v26i00.16084
19. Kye B, Han N, Kim E, Park Y, Jo S. Educational applications of metaverse: possibilities and limitations. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2021;18:32. doi:10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.32
20. Lin H, Wan S, Gan W, Chen J, Chao HC. Metaverse in Education: Vision, Opportunities, and Challenges. In: 2022 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data); 2022 Dec 17-20; Osaka, Japan. IEEE; 2022. doi:10.1109/bigdata55660.2022.10021004
21. Liu Y, Shirley T. Without Crossing a Border: Exploring the Impact of Shifting Study Abroad Online on Students' Learning and Intercultural Competence Development during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Learn. 2021;25(1). doi:10.24059/olj.v25i1.2471
22. Losheniuk I, Kabanova O, Berher A, Karpenko V, Didyk D. The Future of Virtual Reality in Marketing and Advertising: Benefits and Challenges for Business. Futurity Economics&Law. 2023;3(3):176-89.
23. Maheswari D, Ndruru FB, Rejeki DS, Moniaga JV, Jabar BA. Systematic Literature Review on The Usage of IoT in The Metaverse to Support The Education System. In: 2022 5th International Conference on Information and Communications Technology (ICOIACT); 2022 Aug 24-25; Yogyakarta, Indonesia. IEEE; 2022. doi:10.1109/icoiact55506.2022.9971816
24. Omelchuk M, Maksymchuk B, Ihnatenko S, Navolskyi N, Kitsak T, Vitkovskyi O, et al. Developing Professional Competency in First Aid in Future Coaches in Ukraine. Rev Romaneasca Pentru Educ Multidimens. 2022;14(3):392-411. doi:10.18662/rrem/14.3/615
25. Popel S, Mazin V, Maksymchuk B, Saienko V, Chernyshenko T, Maksymchuk I. Network Planning at the Faculties of Physical Education and Sport in the Postmodern Era. BRAIN Broad Res Artif Intell Neurosci. 2023;14(1):554-70. doi:10.18662/brain/14.1/435
26. Marougkas A, Troussas C, Krouska A, Sgouropoulou C. How personalized and effective is immersive virtual reality in education? A systematic literature review for the last decade. Multimed Tools Appl. 2023. doi:10.1007/s11042-023-15986-7
27. Marougkas A, Troussas C, Krouska A, Sgouropoulou C. Virtual Reality in Education: A Review of Learning Theories, Approaches and Methodologies for the Last Decade. Electronics. 2023;12(13):2832. doi:10.3390/electronics12132832
28. Mayer RE, Makransky G, Parong J. The Promise and Pitfalls of Learning in Immersive Virtual Reality. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2022:1-10. doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2108563
29. Morgulets OB, Derkach TM. Information and communication technologies managing the quality of educational activities of a university. ITLT. 2019;71(3):295-304.
30. O'Dowd R. Virtual exchange: moving forward into the next decade. Comput Assist Lang Learn. 2021;34(3):209-24. doi:10.1080/09588221.2021.1902201
31. Onggirawan CA, Kho JM, Kartiwa AP, Anderies, Gunawan AA. Systematic literature review: The adaptation of distance learning process during the COVID-19 pandemic using virtual educational spaces in metaverse. Procedia Comput Sci. 2023;216:274-83. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.137
32. Onu P, Pradhan A, Mbohwa C. Potential to use metaverse for future teaching and learning. Educ Inf Technol. 2023;29(7):8893-8924. doi:10.1007/s10639-023-12167-9
33. Papoutsi C, Drigas A, Skianis C. Virtual and Augmented Reality for Developing Emotional Intelligence Skills. Int J Contrib Eng Sci IT (iJES). 2021;9(3):35. doi:10.3991/ijes.v9i3.23939
34. Peixoto B, Pinto R, Melo M, Cabral L, Bessa M. Immersive Virtual Reality for Foreign Language Education: A PRISMA Systematic Review. IEEE Access. 2021;9:48952-62. doi:10.1109/access.2021.3068858
35. Pushkina N. Developing social skills through rhythmic gymnastics in American sport. Futurity of Social Sciences. 2024;2(2):79-102. doi:10.57125/FS.2024.06.20.05
36. Rakhimov T, Mukhamediev M. Implementation of digital technologies in the medicine of the future. Futurity Medicine. 2022;1(2):14-25. doi:10.57125/FEM.2022.06.30.02
37. Li Q, Liu Q, Jiang M, Wang R. Virtual reality as a bridge: enhancing intercultural learning and communication skills among international students. Int Commun Chin Cult. 2024. doi:10.1007/s40636-024-00297-9
38. Shu X, Gu X. An Empirical Study of A Smart Education Model Enabled by the Edu-Metaverse to Enhance Better Learning Outcomes for Students. Systems. 2023;11(2):75. doi:10.3390/systems11020075
39. Rojas-Sánchez MA, Palos-Sánchez PR, Folgado-Fernández JA. Systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis on virtual reality and education. Educ Inf Technol. 2022. doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11167-5
40. Zhou X, Tang L, Lin D, Han W. Virtual & augmented reality for biological microscope in experiment education. Virtual Real Intell Hardw. 2020;2(4):316-29. doi:10.1016/j.vrih.2020.07.004
41. Hudym I, Abilova O, Potapiuk L, Nikolenko L, Poliakova A. Strategies and best practices for promoting inclusive education to meet diverse learning needs. Conhecimento Divers. 2024;16(42):270-86. doi:10.18316/rcd.v16i42.11682
42. Yuhan N, Osipchuk H, Siroshtan T, Prykhodk V, Mytiay Z. Synergy of philological disciplines: combining the vectors of linguistics and literary studies in the context of modern science. SYNESIS. 2024;16(2):19-32.
43. Scavarelli A, Arya A, Teather RJ. Virtual reality and augmented reality in social learning spaces: a literature review. Virtual Real. 2020. doi:10.1007/s10055-020-00444-8
44. Safikhani S, Keller S, Schweiger G, Pirker J. Immersive virtual reality for extending the potential of building information modeling in architecture, engineering, and construction sector: systematic review. Int J Digital Earth. 2022;15(1):503-26. doi:10.1080/17538947.2022.2038291
45. Soliman M, Pesyridis A, Dalaymani-Zad D, Gronfula M, Kourmpetis M. The application of virtual reality in engineering education. Appl Sci. 2021;11(6):2879. doi:10.3390/app11062879
46. Deardorff DK. Identification and Assessment of Intercultural Competence as a Student Outcome of Internationalization. J Stud Int Educ. 2006;10(3):241-66. doi:10.1177/1028315306287002
47. Lee H, Woo D, Yu S. Virtual reality metaverse system supplementing remote education methods: based on aircraft maintenance simulation. Appl Sci. 2022;12(5):2667. doi:10.3390/app12052667
48. Lee S, Jeon J, Choe H. Enhancing pre‐service teachers' global Englishes awareness with technology: a focus on AI chatbots in 3D metaverse environments. Tesol Q. 2025;59(1):49-74. doi:10.1002/tesq.3300
49. Sipii V, Kurtiak F, Mykhalluk I, Hryhorchuk I, Zasiekina T. Virtual laboratories as a means of increasing accessibility of biological education in Ukraine. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences. 2024;12(4):627-636. doi:10.21533/pen.v12.i4.64. Available from: https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/744205
50. Danilyan OG, Arbeláez-Campillo DF, Rojas-Bahamón MJ. The influence of globalization processes on the cultural sphere. Revista de Filosofia. 2022;39(100):143-154.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Olena Nevoenna, Kyryl Kotun , Oksana Voznyuk , Yuliia Zaverukha, Natalia Kushevska (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
