Combating Information and Psychological Operations Through Youth Media and Information Literacy Development

Authors

  • Anastasiia Bessarab Doctor of Science in Social Communications, Professor, Department of Psychology and Social Work, Faculty of Special Education, Social Sciences and Humanities, Municipal Institution of Higher Education “Khortytsia National Educational and Rehabilitation Academy” of Zaporizhzhia Regional Council Author
  • Inna Penchuk Doctor of Science in Social Communications, Professor, Head of the Department of Journalism and Ukrainian Philology, Director of the Institute of Journalism and Mass Communication, Classical Private University Author
  • Vitalii Babenko PhD in Journalism, Senior Lecturer, Department of the Journalism, Faculty of the Management, University of Customs and Finance Author
  • Galyna Volynets Candidate of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Journalism, National University Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic Author
  • Andrii Pihura Postgraduate Student, MIX Department of Media Technologies, Information and Book Affairs, Institute of Printing Art and Media Technologies, National University “Lviv Polytechnyc” Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/mr2025183

Keywords:

media literacy, digital culture, information and psychological operations, ethics, cultural studies, philosophy, youth, information security, critical thinking

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the role of ethical, cultural, and philosophical aspects in the process of forming media literacy and digital communication culture among young people, considering them as key factors in counteracting information and psychological operations (PSYOP) in the modern information space. The paper argues that the comprehensive development of these components in the younger generation contributes to the formation of critical thinking, responsible online behavior, and the ability to recognize and effectively resist manipulative influences.

The relevance of the study is determined by the rapid growth of information aggression and disinformation, which poses a significant threat to national security, social stability, and the personal development of young people. In the context of hybrid wars and the active use of digital platforms to spread hostile propaganda, it is strategically important to develop a media-literate and ethically responsible younger generation. Insufficient media literacy makes young people particularly vulnerable to manipulation, fake news, and psychological influence, which undermines their ability to make informed decisions and take an active civic stance. In this context, research into the ethical, cultural, and philosophical foundations of media literacy and digital culture is particularly important, as these aspects lay the foundation for critical thinking about information, understanding of socio-cultural contexts, and awareness of responsibility for one's own actions in the online environment.

The research methodology is based on a combination of theoretical and analytical methods. The main methods used were: critical analysis of scientific literature on media literacy, digital culture, information security, ethics, cultural studies, and philosophy; synthesis and generalization of the data obtained to identify key concepts and interrelationships; deduction and induction to specify theoretical provisions and identify practical examples; comparative analysis of existing approaches and strategies for developing media literacy and counteracting PSYOP; interpretation and conceptualization of research results to substantiate the role of ethical, cultural, and philosophical aspects in the context under study.

The results of the study demonstrate that ethical education within the framework of media literacy contributes to the formation of a responsible attitude of young people towards information and an understanding of the principles of honesty, objectivity, and respect in the digital environment. The development of a culture of digital communication that takes into account the cultural context and principles of netiquette is important for preventing cyberbullying and hate speech and promotes tolerance and intercultural dialogue. A philosophical approach to media literacy emphasizes the development of critical thinking, the ability to analyze information, identify manipulative techniques, and form one's own informed judgments. Research confirms that the integration of ethical norms, cultural understanding, and philosophical reflection in the process of developing media literacy and digital culture significantly increases young people's resilience to information and psychological operations, making them less vulnerable to disinformation and manipulation.

The conclusions of the study are that ethical, cultural, and philosophical aspects are fundamental components of the effective formation of media literacy and digital communication culture among young people as an effective way to counteract information and psychological operations. The development of responsible online behavior, understanding of cultural diversity, and critical thinking based on philosophical principles enable young people to consciously shape their information space, recognize manipulative techniques, and counteract disinformation. Integrating these aspects into educational programs and initiatives is key to raising a generation capable of critical thinking, acting responsibly in the digital space, and effectively countering information threats, which is an important investment in the future of information security and societal resilience.

References

1. Byrkovych T, Denysiuk Z, Gaievska L, Akimova L, Prokopenko L, Akimov O. State policy of cultural and art projects funding as a factor in the stability of state development in the conditions of globalization. Economic Affairs (New Delhi). 2023; 68(1):199–211. https://doi.org/10.46852/0424-2513.1s.2023.23

2. Krupskyy I, Zykun N, Mitchuk O, Sushkova O, Sypchenko I. The role of mass media in the social orientation of the masses and social management. Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series “Physics”. 2024; 55:2988–3001. https://10.54919/physics/55.2024.298wt8

3. Chmyr Y, Moshnin A, Tsymbal B, Shchokin R, Balashov A. Societal Content and Main Determinants of “National Security” Phenomenon in the Information and Communication Context. In: O. Radchenko V, Kovach I, Semenets-Orlova A, Zaporozhets, editors. Contributions to Political Science. National Security Drivers of Ukraine. Information Technology, Strategic Communication, and Legitimacy. Cham: Springer. 2023. p. 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33724-6

4. Mitchuk O, Penchuk I, Podluzhna N, Malovichko O, Shirobokova O, Tregub A. Changes in Social Communication as a Tool of Social Workunder the Influence of Digitalization. Studies of Applied Economics. 2021; 39(3):2–11. https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i3.4717

5. Dempsey J, Saniuk-Heinig С. Cybersecurity Law Basics. IAPP25. ResourceCenter, 2025. https://iapp.org/resources/article/cybersecurity-law-basics/

6. Oral U. Netiquette: Fundamentals of Etiquette in Digital Communication. European Journal of Theoretical and Applied Sciences. 2023; 1(5):833–847. https://doi.org/10.59324/ejtas.2023.1(5).70

7. Bidzilya Y, Haladzhun Z, Solomin Y, Georgiievska V, Sydorenko N. Ukrainian journalism and media security in conditions of full-scale Russian aggression. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología – Serie de Conferencias. 2024; 3:769. https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf2024.769

8. Media and digital culture. Shaping Europe’s digital future. European Commission, n. d. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/media-and-digital-culture

9. Mncube S. Cyberbullying a desecration of information ethics: Perceptions of post-high school youth in a rural community. Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society. 2016; 4(4):313–322. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-04-2016-0009

10. Cohen-Almagor R. Cyberbullying, moral responsibility, and social networking: lessons from the megan meier tragedy. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy. 2020;16(1):75–98. https://doi.org/10.31820/ejap.16.1.4

11. Pazer S. The Impact of Social Media Use on Identity Formation among Adolescents. International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and Innovations in Technology. 2024;10(5)-V10I5-1307:299–304. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384893227_The_Impact_of_Social_Media_Use_on_Identity_Formation_among_Adolescents

12. Agarwal A. The effect of social media in identity formation in adolescence. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews. 2024;23(03):775–779. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.23.3.2685

13. Flannery B, Vanterpool M. A Model for Infusing Cultural Diversity Concepts Across the Curriculum. To Improve the Academy: To Improve the Academy: A Journal of Educational Development. 1990;159–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-4822.1990.tb00173.x

14. Mihailidis P. Media Literacy and the Emerging Citizen: Youth, Engagement and Participation in Digital Culture. New York; Peter Lang, 2014. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330888821_Media_Literacy_and_the_Emerging_Citizen_Youth_Engagement_and_Participation_in_Digital_Culture

15. Kaprisma H. Psychological operations: from the communication, media, propaganda, and social-culture perspective. Jurnal Pertahanan Media Informasi ttg Kajian. 2020;6(2):225–238. https://doi.org/10.33172/jp.v6i2.492

16. Shulska N, Kostusiak N, Mitlosh A, Pavlyuk I, Polyvach M, Mudryk A, Sushkova O. Information and Psychological Operations (IPSO) as a Discovery of False Narratives in the Conditions of Military Conflict in the Med. AD ALTA: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research. 2023;13(1):Spec. Issue XХХIV:156–162. https://evnuir.vnu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/22192

17. Talishinsky E. Information and psychological warfare in the context of the war between Azerbaijan and Armenia. Eminak: Scientific Quarterly Journal. 2024;4(44):231–247. https://doi.org/10.33782/eminak2023.4(44).684

18. Radchenko O, Kriukov O, Kovach V, Semenets-Orlova I, Zaporozhets A, Kostenko V. Mental and Value Features of Ukrainian Society in the Context of “Civilizations Clash” as the Main Object of Information War in Ukraine. In: O. Radchenko V, Kovach I, Semenets-Orlova A, Zaporozhets, editors. National Security Drivers of Ukraine Information Technology, Strategic Communication, and Legitimacy. Cham: Springer. 2023. p. 301–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33724-6

19. Chakure A. 52 Tricks to Media Manipulation. DEV Community, 2024, December 19. https://dev.to/afrozchakure/52-tricks-to-media-manipulation-3i5k

20. Butyrina M, Hyrina T, Penchuk I, Bondarenko I, Skurtul G, Tiapkina N. The Development of Innovative Media Education Styles in the Era of Information and Communication Technologies. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching. 2022;11(1):Special Issue 2:195–207. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v11n1p195

21. Poplavska N, Synorub H, Yordan H, Medynska O, Kushnir O, Dragan-Ivanets N. The Use of Binary Online Lessons in the Context of Forming Critical Thinking in Future Journalists. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching. 2022;11(1):273–285. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v11n1p273

22. Tkachenko O, Zhylenko I, Poplavska N, Mitchuk O, Kuzmenko H,, Zolyak V. Personnel Behaviour Management Through Social Communications. Estudios de Economia Aplicada. 2021; 39(5): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i5.4837

23. Neuberger C. Was erwartet die Gesellschaft vom Internet – und was erhält sie? Printed in Germany. Gedruckt mit finanzieller Unterstützung der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, 2018.

24. Young people – digital world. Eurostat. Statistics Explained, 2025. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Being_young_in_Europe_today_-_digital_world&oldid=564756#Source_data_for_tables_and_graphs

25. Anti-FakeUNITED Media 24, n. d. https://united24media.com/anti-fake

26. Recommendations. Cyber police. National Police of Ukraine, n.d. https://cyberpolice.gov.ua/articles/

27. Center for Antivirus Protection of Information. State websites of Ukraine. Centre for Anti-Virus Information Protection, n. d. https://cazi.gov.ua/uk

28. Ethics in Digital Communication. Guidelines developed by the Austrian PR Ethics Council (PR Ethik Rat) and recommend by the International Communications Consultancy Organisation (ICCO), 2017. https://iccopr.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Ethics-in-Digital-Communications-Guidelines.pdf

29. Understanding propaganda and disinformation. At a glance, November. Evropean Parlament, 2015. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ATAG/2015/571332/EPRS_ATA(2015)571332_EN.pdf

30. Berlo DK. The Process of Communication. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston. 1960. https://archive.org/details/dli.ernet.235577/mode/2up?view=theater

31. Twetman H, Pamment J, Nothhaft H., Fjällhed A. The Role of Communicators in Countering the Malicious use of Social Media. NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence, 2019, March, 13. https://stratcomcoe.org/publications/the-role-of-communicators-in-countering-the-malicious-use-of-social-media/101

32. Declaration by the Committee of Ministers on Internet governance principles (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 21 September 2011 at the 1121st meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies). Council of Europe. Committee of Ministers, 2011. https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectID=09000016805cc2f6

Downloads

Published

2025-08-01

How to Cite

1.
Bessarab A, Penchuk I, Babenko V, Volynets G, Pihura A. Combating Information and Psychological Operations Through Youth Media and Information Literacy Development. Metaverse Basic and Applied Research [Internet]. 2025 Aug. 1 [cited 2025 Aug. 20];4:183. Available from: https://mr.ageditor.ar/index.php/mr/article/view/183